Also, he gave me an example about how the two answer could affect me in real life. He said, if you were in court and they asked what hurt you the T-rex or the bee, and i would say the T-rex and since they dont exist I have no idea what I'm talking about... idk he just gave me this random examples that I totally understand but he's refusing to admit that there 2 ways to this question in my opinion. Or I'm wrong..idk so help me out. I need a strong answer or multiple people to say what the answer is cause so far, I'm wrong and stupid and my Dad thinks there is no way A T-Rex can't cause It doesn;t exist, well in the question...isn't he comparing the two in seeing what would hurt more? regardless of when it existed? And evertime he says the questions he points at me and empathizes the "YOU" part, too me, that doesnt make a difference..doesnt matter if the Trex does exist or if I didnt exist or if Adolf Hitler didnt exist, isnt he not asking me what would hurt more!? Like please help? Need real world answers

He's telling you a joke. It's obvious that the massive creature that could crush you and rip you to shreds could hurt you more that the bug that hurts and leaves an itchy bump.

You're way to literal right now. He told you a JOKE and you took it the complete wrong way. He wasn't being serious, and it probably wasn't a legit argument. Just you being an idiot.