Not including the oh so typical and corny answer of 'humans'. Trust me, a polar bear would win in at fisty cuffs played fair.

If not the polar bear then what?

No.

Siberian and Bengal tigers killed Polar bears in 1907 and 1962. Even lions have killed Polar bears, in 1909. Yet there is not one record of it being the other way around.

Also, tigers from Burma dragged over 770kg while the Polar bear (largest land carnivore) can only manage 598kg. Making the tiger the strongest land predator and most dangerous animal on Earth.

Did I mention tigers also have the most recorded deaths as a man-eater, are the only land animal known to kill fully grown elephants alone, the second largest threat to rhinos (poaching is first), and I can keep going.

I think you get the point.

They are up there with other apex predators like lions, tigers, leopards, certain species of sharks, and Saltwater crocodiles. I'm would bet that fewer people are killed by polar bears than some of these others because polar bears live in places that aren't densely populated with humans. Salt water crocodiles live in some of the most densely populated areas of the world.

I think people. We animals. We stupid. We ****!!!!!!!

Not including the oh so typical and corny answer of 'humans'. Trust me, a polar bear would win in at fisty cuffs played fair.

If not the polar bear then what?